How "fe-male" was made

In my blog I speak about lies in names such as wo-man. This being is not a man, yet she is named as one by a name that embeds 'man'. Then the name of what she was before is put out of use so that we have no choice but to use the false name.

Embedding something that is not correct, not true to reality in names, wouldn't work if there were only one name that embeds a falsehood.

In the 13th Century a poet writing a poem had a line ending with "male." His next line would end with "feme." Rhyming was very important in this era so he changed feme to fe +male to make it rhyme.
The name 'feme' was put out of use, we had no choice but to use "fe +male."

Also, before wo -man was coined she had named herself "fem." So what we can say here is that fem's identity as fem and feme were erased and she was, to coin a new term, masculinized as fe -male and wo -man.

As a consequence the whole species is called "mankind" when only half the species are male.

Lies always need more lies. It becomes hard to undo the harms and damages done by lies. The only way is to stop the lies and use the true names.

When something is false it is a lie

The following encapsulates the core of my work.

Knowing what a fig is you cannot call an apple an apfig.
Apfig is false. To use the name is to lie about the apple.
You are saying that the apple is essentially a fig when in reality it is not a fig.
You would need more lies to cover and explain the lie that is apfig.

This kind of falsehood directly concerns the speech-making and
speech-using species: our species.

Knowing what a man is you cannot call the other gender a wo-man.
1 You are saying that she is essentially a man when she is not a man.
2 Being man in reality entails ONLY being male.
Wo+man is false. To use wo+man is to lie about this being.

A lie almost always needs more lies to back it up. As a result our species is described and explained mostly by lies. The harms the lies causes and caused to both genders is discussed in my books An Inconvenient Lie and Breaking the Patriarchal Code.
Please visit www. inconvenientlie.ca

Today's dictators

When you see the behaviour of today's dictators in view of losing power over "their" people, you can better visualize how emperors, kings, pharaohs and ruling dictators long ago assumed divinity, Lordship as Gods, to legitimate their control over "the masses." It would be hard today for 'Ghadafi' to pull off the trick of being divine, a god! However, it does not stop some of these dictators calling themselves the "Father" of their nation!
Watching today's dictators fight to save their control it is easy to see how fear-guilt-fight as a method was an absolute must-do program for men who lusted for control over others thousands of years ago. This program of fear (in not serving the Lord), guilt (for not serving the Lord) and having large powerful armies (serving the Lord) to put down any dissent is how patriarchy started 6 - 10 thousand years ago. It was only a matter of time for Manu to make slavery legal for Lords like himself in 2400BCE by official/written statute.
The strange thing about the beginnings of patriarchy is that historians don't describe history this way.

Basis of Slavery

Basis of Slavery

It is important to understand the basis of slavery. It started with the subjugation of one gender by laws. The laws influenced the naming of the genders to fit the laws of subjugation.

In 2400BCE Manu of the Hindi put Sloka V into law - the subjugation of one gender to the other.
1000 years later 'God' was given the name E-manu-el, meaning the manu in us.
1000 years after god was named Emanuel the Romans put The Manus into law: the authoritative control of the husband over the wife. From this we can trace - Manu - Emanuel - Manus back 4000 years. Patriarchy, slavery and feudalism went on for 4000 years to about 1850ACE.

Language developed with these laws and social systems in mind. The name man, from Manu , means male slave. W-o-man is wife-of-slave. Males who were not slaves were Lords.

Today it is belief that "man consists of man and woman as humans" In an earlier post I showed this to be false. These are not names based in reality. They are based in patriarchal ideology, rule and control by Lords.

Solution: change the names to be true-to-reality. I show how this is done in my book An Inconvenient Lie. http://www.inconvenientlie.ca/

The Truth

It’s time to bring things together and put them on the table for all to see. Let’s have a good look at Truth in names rooted in gender. In reality there are millions of truths.

Woman is the Apfig of Mankind

To start we say: mankind consists of man and woman as humans, repetitious naming using the name man. In an earlier blog we learned that Manu subjugated one gender to the otherby law 4000 years ago? In another blog we learned that the Manus by the Romans 2000 years later put this idea into law again? And in 2010 we believe mankind consists of man and woman as humans is Truth? There are big problems in reasoning for good thinking and a huge implication for intelligence in this Truth.

When we say that “man consists of man and woman as humans” we are actually saying: man is and is not male. We do not say an electron is and is not a negative charge. This is confusing and false. Man is and is not male is a falsehood we use to live life.

A fact is missing. The fact is: Being man in reality entails ONLY being male. It cannot be the case that being man (also) entails NOT being male. We cannot pretend that man is TWO genders. In fact ‘man’ excludes one half of the species. Half the species are not male. The harms done to both genders by falsehoods and missing facts are many and are described in my book An Inconvenient Lie.

To continue, since being man entails only being male, what does ‘woman’ mean? Like the tactic of adding ‘ap’ to fig, wo is added to ‘man’ to name her woman. The real definition of a woman then is: a ‘man’ (in name) who’s not a man in reality, she’s not male. ‘Woman’ is another falsehood. Another fact is missing. You start to see the buildup of falsehoods and missing facts. This ‘lowers’ the intelligence and creates the perception of having an insufficient mind, a mind that needs help ‘to live the right way.’

Finally, like ‘ap’ is added to fig, ‘hu’ is added to ‘man to make human. ‘Hu’ cannot and does not change ‘man’ to mean a species of two men of opposite genders. This is not only absurd, it is another falsehood. Another fact is missing.

Before these falsehoods were Truth each gender had made more correct names, names that were truer to the reality of each gender. These names were put out of usage to push the patriarchal agenda. .

Belief is not the same as Knowledge

First, the term believe comes from the concept of “loving an idea.” To belove an idea made the symbol believe. When you are asked to believe something you are being asked to belove the idea being planted in your mind.

The difference between believing something and knowing something can be as wide as the difference between having a glass of poisonous water and a glass of pure water to choose from. Both glasses look like they contain drinkable water, right? To lose the meaning of what it means to believe is to lose the ability to tell the difference between belief and knowledge. It is to lose the meaning of what it means to be ‘ignorant’.

Knowledge is about the way reality is, it states reality-as-it-is. Knowledge is about facts and the many truths. Belief is about the Truth, an absolute way about the way the world is as told -- by someone else. Belief is dangerous.

Ignorance and (the amount of) intelligence (one has) are often purposely made out to be the same thing. Not believing (in something) has often been called ignorance, soon translated as having ‘an insufficient mind’. The basic belief in belief is that you have to believe in something and someone to give you guidance to live “the right way.”

Here again, this is the circular argument that too many people do not recognize as being false. Belief in falsehoods begets more belief in falsehoods. People ‘believe’ (belove the idea) that they have “to believe” the Truth to live “the right way.”

The Truth has nothing to do with knowledge. Knowledge is about the millions of facts and the millions of truths about the what, how, where, when of reality-as-it-is. Reality has billions of cause and effect relationships that we must put together correctly. The basis of truths expands intelligence, builds knowledge and accumulates wisdom.

Being the architect of my life and my identity

Be the architect of my life? What? Not me! I don’t have the intelligence.

Why would you believe you don’t have the intelligence to be the architect of your own life? Who else lives your life? Why should someone else have a say in what and who you are? Who told you that you didn’t have the right amount of intelligence? What led you to believe such a lie?

It is a lie because we know that evolution gave most individuals in the species about the same amount of intelligence. There are a few exceptions but reason tells us that you do not argue from exceptions to find the rule or the norm. 95% of all the individuals in the speech-using species have about the same amount of intelligence. You have sufficient intelligence to be the architect of your own identity and your life.

Don’t believe for one minute that you have a slow, low or insufficient intelligence. This is the ploy used to make you believe all sorts of lies instead of wanting to know the facts. The fact is: you have sufficient intelligence to know that your life is your responsibility it is not for someone else to tell you what to believe.

In An Inconvenient Lie I show the many tricks in language used to make you believe in your insufficient mind and intelligence. To believe in your ‘insufficient mind’ is to be controlled. It is to believe in falsehoods passed off as Truth.

This is the situation. The falsehoods embedded in language have been passed on to you from ideas hundreds and some even thousands of years old. You had to use these falsehoods called Truth without your knowledge.