The following encapsulates the core of my work.
Knowing what a fig is you cannot call an apple an apfig.
Apfig is false. To use the name is to lie about the apple.
You are saying that the apple is essentially a fig when in reality it is not a fig.
You would need more lies to cover and explain the lie that is apfig.
This kind of falsehood directly concerns the speech-making and
speech-using species: our species.
Knowing what a man is you cannot call the other gender a wo-man.
1 You are saying that she is essentially a man when she is not a man.
2 Being man in reality entails ONLY being male.
Wo+man is false. To use wo+man is to lie about this being.
A lie almost always needs more lies to back it up. As a result our species is described and explained mostly by lies. The harms the lies causes and caused to both genders is discussed in my books An Inconvenient Lie and Breaking the Patriarchal Code.
Please visit www. inconvenientlie.ca
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
