How "fe-male" was made

In my blog I speak about lies in names such as wo-man. This being is not a man, yet she is named as one by a name that embeds 'man'. Then the name of what she was before is put out of use so that we have no choice but to use the false name.

Embedding something that is not correct, not true to reality in names, wouldn't work if there were only one name that embeds a falsehood.

In the 13th Century a poet writing a poem had a line ending with "male." His next line would end with "feme." Rhyming was very important in this era so he changed feme to fe +male to make it rhyme.
The name 'feme' was put out of use, we had no choice but to use "fe +male."

Also, before wo -man was coined she had named herself "fem." So what we can say here is that fem's identity as fem and feme were erased and she was, to coin a new term, masculinized as fe -male and wo -man.

As a consequence the whole species is called "mankind" when only half the species are male.

Lies always need more lies. It becomes hard to undo the harms and damages done by lies. The only way is to stop the lies and use the true names.

When something is false it is a lie

The following encapsulates the core of my work.

Knowing what a fig is you cannot call an apple an apfig.
Apfig is false. To use the name is to lie about the apple.
You are saying that the apple is essentially a fig when in reality it is not a fig.
You would need more lies to cover and explain the lie that is apfig.

This kind of falsehood directly concerns the speech-making and
speech-using species: our species.

Knowing what a man is you cannot call the other gender a wo-man.
1 You are saying that she is essentially a man when she is not a man.
2 Being man in reality entails ONLY being male.
Wo+man is false. To use wo+man is to lie about this being.

A lie almost always needs more lies to back it up. As a result our species is described and explained mostly by lies. The harms the lies causes and caused to both genders is discussed in my books An Inconvenient Lie and Breaking the Patriarchal Code.
Please visit www. inconvenientlie.ca

Today's dictators

When you see the behaviour of today's dictators in view of losing power over "their" people, you can better visualize how emperors, kings, pharaohs and ruling dictators long ago assumed divinity, Lordship as Gods, to legitimate their control over "the masses." It would be hard today for 'Ghadafi' to pull off the trick of being divine, a god! However, it does not stop some of these dictators calling themselves the "Father" of their nation!
Watching today's dictators fight to save their control it is easy to see how fear-guilt-fight as a method was an absolute must-do program for men who lusted for control over others thousands of years ago. This program of fear (in not serving the Lord), guilt (for not serving the Lord) and having large powerful armies (serving the Lord) to put down any dissent is how patriarchy started 6 - 10 thousand years ago. It was only a matter of time for Manu to make slavery legal for Lords like himself in 2400BCE by official/written statute.
The strange thing about the beginnings of patriarchy is that historians don't describe history this way.